Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Robert Parker on the "struggle" of New World wines

Robert Parker looking hale. Courtesy The Independent
In an interview published Sunday, Robert Parker tells The Independent of London,

"New World wines still struggle to match the greats Old World classics are there because they have endured. The rest is still a work in progress. They still judge what they make against the great wines of places such as Bordeaux."

Parker has given 117 California wines perfect ratings of 100 points, almost all in the last 15 years.

Guess how many Bordeaux wines Parker has given 100 points, including all historical vintages like 1921 and 1947? 86. 

One can argue that Parker's perfect scores are meaningless, but they should mean something to Parker. 

Can't wait 'til the "work in progress" is completed!

Follow me on Twitter: @wblakegray and like The Gray Report on Facebook.

Thursday, March 26, 2015

Wine Institute choice on arsenic: defend every wine or tell consumers to spend more?

Everyone expects the Wine Institute to be the main line of defense on the arsenic-in-wine story. That's its role. But it has a choice to make.

Should it defend the big players named in a class action lawsuit, or kick them to the curb and urge consumers to buy more expensive wines?

Either is a legitimate strategy. The 83 wines named in the lawsuit are cheap. Even the lawyers who filed the suit, in a press conference, urged people to spend more money on wine.

"The lower the price of wine, the more arsenic you are getting," plaintiffs' attorney David K. TeStelle said.

Only 11 wineries are named in the lawsuit, and there are more than 3000 wineries in California. Most of them must resent the fallout they're getting from the story, as all must explain to their customers that wine is at least as safe as brown rice, brussels sprouts and apple juice (products shown previously to contain arsenic.)

Is it more effective -- and more rewarding -- to tell consumers that all wine is safe, or that all wine above $10 a bottle is safe?

The decision is complicated because of an enormous omission from the list of defendants. E. & J. Gallo Winery, the world's largest wine producer, is not one of the 11 wineries named.

Wednesday, March 25, 2015

"Certified Sustainable" greenwashing doesn't remove arsenic

From the CSWA website. How can 57% of the state's wines be sustainable when only 14% of vineyards are?
People have been asking, "Why did you take down your blog post Monday?"

I wrote a 1000-word essay about the arsenic-in-wine story. My main conclusion was that I wasn't bothered by the recent revelations about arsenic, as long as there was no greenwashing.

Then I discovered there is plenty of greenwashing, as more than 2/3 of the wines listed in the lawsuit are made by "certified sustainable" wineries.

Thursday, March 19, 2015

Ordinary wines are often better than special reserves: Avignonesi edition

Virginie Saverys
Avignonesi in Montepulciano is under new foreign ownership and direction that is actually restoring, in some ways, its Old World taste profile.

Virginie Saverys, who comes from a Belgian shipping magnate family, bought the winery in 2009 after its Italian owners, two brothers, couldn't work together anymore. She quickly moved to take the winery toward using only estate grapes and to focus on Sangiovese, instead of the Bordeaux varieties that find their way into many wines of the region. She also is taking the vineyards biodynamic.

Monday, March 16, 2015

Where does San Francisco rank among world wine cities?

Sommeliers walk among us in San Francisco
A carpetbagger wine critic from New York recently gave San Francisco a middle finger from the window of his moving van about how SF's sommelier culture is dying. I don't want to get into all the rant's inconsistencies; Alder Yarrow has done a nice job of that.

What I want you to consider is the question in the headline. Where does San Francisco rank among world wine cities?

First, a little perspective. San Francisco is the 14th largest city in the United States, just behind Jacksonville, Florida and just ahead of Columbus, Ohio. Yarrow gives an incomplete list of at least 59 San Francisco restaurants that have a sommelier working the floor. For a city of its size, that seems pretty good to me, though I'd like to see the numbers for Jacksonville.

Most reasonable people would put San Francisco without much debate among the top 4 American cities for wine, along with New York (10x bigger), Los Angeles (4.6x bigger) and Chicago (3.2x bigger). A DC resident could make an argument for Washington. I think most wine people would put LA, Chicago and DC, despite their many great restaurants, behind San Francisco for wine culture. Just ask the many foreign wine producers who make San Francisco a key stop on their American tour itineraries. But feel free to make a counter-argument in the comments.

That leads me to non-American cities. How many cities, in the entire world, might be better for wine culture?

First, let's define "wine culture."

Thursday, March 12, 2015

I made my own tonic water

Chino's Danny Louie and Bittercube's Ira Koplowitz
Gin and tonics are about as complex a cocktail as you can get from two ingredients. Now I better understand why.

Bacardi is running a pretty cool program to push one of its gins: it's offering the chance for 10 bars each in 10 cities to make their own house tonic water, at Bacardi's expense.

It seems like a win-win promotion: 100 bars get the DYI cachet of their own house tonic. Bacardi pays for the tonic water, but likely sells more of its Bombay Sapphire East gin, although the bar can do anything it wants with the tonic.

I tagged along last week at Chino, a bar/restaurant I like in my neighborhood in San Francisco. Bar manager Danny Louie and I both made our own tonics.

We started with a syrup Louie made from Demerara sugar and added a few drops of quinine and citric acid. Then we had our choice of a dozen essences that a Wisconsin company called Bittercube produces. Some were exotic and seemed right for Chino's menu: Thai lemongrass and Vietnamese black peppercorn.

Thursday, March 5, 2015

Dear wineries: Big wine & spirits distributors hate you

Southern Wine & Spirits Director of Sales Joseph Eger (crotch being grabbed) at the Hustler Club. Photo: Facebook/New York Post
The New York Post ran a story this week about Southern Wine & Spirits' Director of Sales dumping Champagne into an ice bucket while a stripper grabbed his crotch.

The sales director, Joseph Eger, was upset because Laurent-Perrier was moving its account to Winebow. Hard to blame L-P, when you look at what Southern thought of its product.

But that's exactly what most big distributors think of the wines they carry: interchangeable juice not as interesting as a stripper's grip.

The Post story is lurid, but it's also right on about distributors' attitude. It's an issue nobody talks about loudly in the wine industry for fear of retribution. But they talk about it to each other all the time.

What sucks about this for consumers is that this is why supermarkets and big wine stores tend to carry the same industrially made wines, because those are the ones that move most easily through the major distribution channels. If you want an interesting wine, you have to go to small wine shops that pay attention to small distributors.

Not only that, the big distributors make more money -- a lot more -- on each bottle of wine you buy that passes through their hands than either the winery or the store. You're paying for their lap dances!

Some wineries, particularly those outside the U.S., think they're fortunate when a big U.S. distributor agrees to take them on. Then a year passes and they've had about as many chargebacks for samples as actual sales, and they wonder, why isn't my wine selling?

Three reasons: